news

AI, Virtual Influencers, and Books Galore: The Future is Now (Maybe)

From digital influencers to AI-generated books, and the issues with generative video. The tech update you didn't see coming.

By ·

AI, Virtual Influencers, and Books Galore: The Future is Now (Maybe)

Friends, take a deep breath. If you thought 2026 was the year AI would start producing decent coffee for everyone, well, maybe we need to revise our expectations. Reality, as usual, is a bit more slice-of-life and a bit less Hollywood. We're talking about a world where your social feeds could be dominated by faces that don't exist, where reading a book becomes a "data-driven" adventure (in the sense that the data was generated by AI), and where making a decent video with AI is still a skill issue for many. Let's get ready for a digest that tastes a bit like the future and a bit like "what's going on?".

The Metaverse is Dead? Long Live Virtual Influencers!

Okay, let's get this straight: the concept of the metaverse as we imagined it, like Ready Player One with fewer tight suits, is having a bit of a hard time. But this doesn't mean the digital world isn't creating new stars. On the contrary. Brands have discovered a new weapon in their social arsenal: AI-generated influencers. Think about it: zero diva tantrums, zero scandals making headlines on TMZ, just a digital face promoting products 24/7. Is it a game-changer or a fleeting fad? The truth is, for now, it seems more like a clever move by those who want to maximize ROI without too many headaches. The risk? That the public will realize that behind that perfect vibe, there's not a real person, but just a well-trained algorithm. And there, the magic disappears. The real challenge will be creating an emotional connection, something that, for now, AI struggles to replicate.

Students and AI: The Impossible War

Let's talk about school. If you've been a student in recent years, you know that using ChatGPT to write essays became the low-effort favorite of many. But now the story gets complicated. It seems that digital cheating has become "impossible to detect". Translated: our already stressed professors find themselves facing an invisible enemy. Language models have become so good at imitating human style that distinguishing a text written by a student from one generated by AI has become a real skill issue. It's not just a problem for students, but also for those trying to maintain a certain academic or professional standard. Imagine a world where every piece of text, from a thesis to a newspaper article, could have been created by a bot. It's not exactly the future we dreamed of, right?

The Boom of AI Books: The "Slop" Invades Amazon

Here we enter the territory of "slop", as The Economist calls it. Since the launch of ChatGPT-3.5, the number of e-books published on Amazon has exploded, tripling by the end of 2025. The cause? AI-generated books. And we're not talking about literary masterpieces. These are low-effort contents, often repetitive, created en masse to ride trends or exploit popular topics. It's a bit like the web has turned into a gigantic library of literary fast food. On one hand, it democratizes publication; on the other, it risks drowning quality under a sea of mediocre content. If you're an author or think you'll become one, this is a strong signal: you need to offer something unique, something human, something AI can't replicate.

Generative Video: Nice Idea, But Does it Work?

Generative video is one of the hottest fields in AI, but it seems there's still a long way to go. The question circulating is: what's the biggest technical limitation right now? Well, improvements have been crazy, but we're still far from perfect video generation. Visual artifacts, narrative inconsistencies, wooden animations. If you want to create professional-quality videos, for now, you still need to get your hands dirty with editing. It's not a boomer move to think that technology still has its limits, actually. It's just reality. AI can lend a hand, speed up certain processes, but for a wow result, you still need the human touch.

The Paradox of the Solution Without a Problem

And then there's the cherry on top: who builds a solution without being sure there's a problem. This is a classic in the tech world, and AI is no exception. Maybe you've developed a crazy AI-based tool, but if there's no real need or concrete problem to solve, it risks being just an exercise in style. It's a bit like having a super technological hammer but no nails to drive. The lesson here is simple: before pushing a new technology or solution, make sure it solves a real problem for someone. Otherwise, you're just creating digital noise.

And the Data Centers? More Powerful, Less Popular

Let's close with a note that tastes of political debate and environmental impact. In Utah, a data center was approved despite widespread opposition. This reminds us that, while AI advances in giant leaps, the infrastructure that supports it (data centers) is becoming more central, but also more controversial. The thirst for data and computational power is immense, and this translates into enormous structures that require energy and occupy space. Public opinion, sometimes, seems to be the last to be heard when it comes to "brute forced" approvals. It's a dynamic we need to keep an eye on, because the digital future has a very real impact on our physical present.

So, between non-existent influencers, bot-generated books, and videos that still struggle, 2026 is definitely an interesting year for AI. The game is constantly evolving, and we're here to tell you about it. Stay connected.

Sources

  • Utah Data Center Brute Forced Through to Approval Despite Widespread Popular Opposition (r/artificial) https://reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1ubm0q3/utah_data_center_brute_forced_through_to_approval/
  • Brands using AI-generated influencers to promote products on social media | AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian (r/artificial) https://reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1ubk0io/brands_using_aigenerated_influencers_to_promote/
  • Student cheating now impossible to detect (r/artificial) https://reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1ub0w2t/student_cheating_now_impossible_to_detect/
  • What do you think is currently the biggest technical limitation in generative AI video? (r/artificial) https://reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1ubne3w/what_do_you_think_is_currently_the_biggest/
  • The Surge of Slop, since the release of ChatGPT-3.5 in late 2022, the number of e-books published on Amazon has skyrocketed, tripling by late 2025. A new scientific analysis shows that this is entirely due to the rise of AI-generated books, which now far outnumber human-written books. The Economist] (r/artificial) [https://reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1ubnaqo/the_surge_of_slopsince_the_release_of_chatgpt35/
  • I built a solution but not sure if the problem even exists? (r/artificial) https://reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1ubn1m2/i_built_a_solution_but_not_sure_if_the_problem/